Sample Book Review on Language power and conflict in the Middle East

Language, power, and conflict in the Middle East

Introduction

Language is a factor that plays an important role in issues relating to management, power, and politics. On various occasions, we use language to gain familiarity and retain support from those we view as close allies (Suleiman 22). The use of language in determining individual nationality arises with a focus on current political situations and growing conflicts among Middle East countries.

Body

In the context of politics and power, Suleiman identifies language as the basic tool in ensuring control of people’s thought alongside creating a notion of defined national identity (Suleiman 27). Language as an element of communication has been used to manipulate the public and to ensure conformity to particular political and power structures. In the Middle East political system, the Arabic language remains the major driving force with a record of a long heritage. Thus, according to Suleiman, the Use of the Arabic language in almost the entire Middle East has left a mark on peoples’ understanding of the political system and the provisionary duty as one of the functions of various governments (Suleiman 37). Other than the mentioned successes, Suleiman records the emergence of conflict in the Middle East as a product of language and a range of cultural practices as well as historical diversities. In this connection, we examine some of the thoughts presented by Suleiman through his work basin ourselves on the relationship between language, power, and conflict in the Middle East. Other than the mentioned issues, what is the connection between language, power, and conflict in the Middle East?

The Middle East political system is based majorly on language and nationality as the major form of identity. The level of political control and power separation is a complete measure of differences that exist in Arab society this has a connection to the Arabic language. On matters of conflict, we observe two distinct levels controlled by the urge to remain at the helm of power. The initiation process of power distinction emerges from the initials of political affiliates (Suleiman 44). Under the prospects of communism and political intervention, the language barrier makes power and control remain in the hands of few individuals who better understand themselves. The inter-conflict and intra-conflict are controlled singly by the groups who identify themselves to be united by one common language and similar social interests.

On the aspect of idea generation and decision making, governments seem to work best with individuals with whom they can speak a common language while facilitating the provision of public utilities. Without the creation of a common political base through language, Suleiman identifies instances of intra-conflict and reasonably extended inability to execute some important goals as earlier projected. Most governments in the Middle East speak a common language of economic progress. For example, countries like Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, and Kuwait rely heavily on oil and petroleum products and are the main source of national revenues (Suleiman 52). The commonness in terms of resource allocation has led to intense competition and the urge to monopolize oil production and global oil supplies. As observed in the recent past, these countries have ended up in conflicts and subsequent wars that are never-ending.

Conclusion

In general, the classification of individuals according to language creates to create a picture of non-inclusiveness in political control. In most cases, the alienated groups tend to oppose the policies of control with the objective of creating a channel for power distribution. Work cited

Suleiman, Yasir. A War of Words: Language and Conflict in the Middle East. Cambridge [u.a.: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Print.