Sample Essay on Morality Play: Pledge of Allegiance

Morality Play: Pledge of Allegiance

Discussion Board

It is unconstitutional to require children to recite the pledge in its current form. The pledge is actually a civic loyalty ceremony that incorporates some religious words. It has clauses such as ‘Under God’, which was included belatedly and objects to some religious values, which prohibits some people from swearing or making oaths. Besides this, I have the right constitutionally as an American citizen to exercise my right of conscience.

Persuasive Essay

My children cannot be compelled to recite the pledge. This is because the Free Exercise Clause of Violation in the Constitution protects them as American citizens. Should my children be singled out, rebuked, or penalized for failing to recite the pledge in this form. This is because the rights of my children are constitutionally protected against the breach of their freedom of conscience (Pellot 2).

It is unconstitutional to recite the pledge since it has some religious words, which are against some religious beliefs. As a universal recitation, the pledge should accommodate a growing number of faiths in the country and those who are eschewed to no religion. The pledge discriminates against the atheists for instance, who have no god. As a government-sanctioned endorsement, the pledge violates the democracy and freedom of the citizens as they are obliged to recite is against their wishes. This implies that for the international students who may be in the country for some time they are obliged to adhere to the American culture irrespective of their position. Besides, the nation is wide and diverse, with more than one nation within the nation. Therefore, sticking to the quote if God is somehow challenging to all nations who have varied gods (Pellot 1).

As a citizen of free world, children should be allowed to choose for themselves if they are comfortable with reciting the pledge. Although some people deem it as necessary, children as locals of the country are bound by the same constitution that upholds the pledge. It is unnecessary to ignore the constitution on matters regarding children yet expect the same children to adhere to the constitution. Furthermore, the Supreme Court in 1943 guaranteed the students the right to avoid reciting the pledge.

It is better if the children would be in a position to understand every single word before they are compelled to recite it. This is because the Supreme Court overturned the compulsory position in the American classroom. This is because pledging personal allegiance to the body is an important activity that demands a high level of maturity. Moreover, exercise of individual freedom demands exercise of freedom of choice, religion, and expression. All these guards against coercion and silence as an American.

Children are still too innocent to make the oaths. It is legal to recite the pledge. However, it is culturally and socially too challenging for children. The words in the pledge are also excessively complicated for a 12 year old to understand. By making the children recite the pledge, they are made to make a commitment they barely understand. The oaths demands understanding of the words and maturity. Compelling a child to act as an adult is a breach of the child rights. Additionally, it is pressuring for children to stand in a form of concentration and be conventional to the standards.

The Supreme Court had judged numerous cases regarding the same issue and directed the public to the relevance in the Constitution. Referring to the 1943 case, the Supreme Court held that nobody should be attacked on the basis on failing to adhere to the compulsory recitation of the pledge. The Supreme Court stated clearly that the pledge should be voluntary. This ruling affects children too

Works Cited

Pellot, Brian. “Why I Stopped saying America’s Pledge of Allegiance.” Religion News Service.

September 2014. Accessed on March 16 2017