The Constructivism Theory of Developmental Psychology
There are several theories presenting conflicting ideas and opinions on the best strategy that parents can use to bring up their children in the most constructive way (Hajizadeh, 2012, p. 57). With the various levels of parenting styles, parents aim at combining factors that may inhibit behavioral evolution within children over time and allow children to develop personalities that will allow them to move through various stages of life effectively (Hajizadeh, 2012, p. 59). Good parenting style is in most cases influenced by some of the factors such as parent and child’s attitude, social environment, and communal cultural practices. This paper is based on the constructivism theory of developmental parenting as brought forth by Jean Piaget and makes an elaborate investigation into the life of a teenager (Jiménez, Moreno, Rivera & García-Moya, 2013, p. 594).
The constructivism theory of developmental psychology is the work of Jean Piaget. The theory describes the two phases of a child’s development that correspond to ages and stages with highly developed cognitive abilities (Jiménez, Moreno, Rivera & García-Moya, 2013, p. 596). Under the constructivism theory of developmental psychology, Jean Piaget derives his understanding from the perspective that human beings can understand better the information they construct on their own (Jiménez, Moreno, Rivera & García-Moya, 2013, p. 600). Thus, learning is a process that allows social advancement in areas of language and communication, understanding real-world issues, and creating a base for social interactions and communal collaborations. Under such a development theory, a person is considered central in the learning process, and depending on certain factors like prejudice, time, experience, and levels of maturity, which may be physical, or mental we end up becoming the intended person or the unintended replica of the society.
Lot in life is a phrase that describes familiarity, acceptance, and recognition of a person’s character (King, Vidourek & Merianos, 2013, p. 71). The main idea as described under the entire concept of a lot in life is to take the first step of accepting a person entirely as he or she is and then developing the best mechanism to help in molding the best of a character. Linking to the statement given on a teenager who at an early age of 14 years consumes drug and drug substances, the best method to help such an individual out of pre-occurrences and possible danger is by applying the rules of Jean Piaget as illustrated in constructivism theory of developmental cognitive (King, Vidourek & Merianos, 2013, p. 73). The major reason behind selecting the constructivism developmental theory for a teenager faced with the described phenomenon is that the theory offers a base to discover, educate as an initiation to cause behavioral transformation. Out of willingness, the constructivism theory will allow the teenager to develop knowledge that in one way will help in behavior change.
The basic idea that underlies the use of constructivism theory is that under the varied circumstances, constructivism is offered the best parenting style and in one way creates an impact in the life of a child by explaining the cause of the behavior change and the problems associated (Oshri, Tubman & Burnette, 2012, p. 254), examines the most effective community services and standardized interventions that may get the child out of the impediments as far as physical and mental growth is concerned.
The theory of constructivism accurately applies to the case of Lot in life. From the reports given by social media, governmental and non-governmental organizations, there is an increasing need to provide firsthand therapy to teenagers who are being exposed to alcohol and abuse of other drug substances (Gudjonsson, Sigurdsson, Sigfusdottir & Young, 2012, p. 306). The structural application of constructivism theory is based on schemes, assimilation, and accommodation with an intention of enhancing predispositions in behavior.
Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J. F., Sigfusdottir, I. D., & Young, S. (2012). An epidemiological study of ADHD symptoms among young persons and the relationship with cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and illicit drug use. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(3), 304-312.
Hajizadeh, E. (2012). Application of the theory of planned behavior to predict drug abuse related behaviors among adolescents. Journal of research in health sciences, 12(1), 54-60.
Jiménez-Iglesias, A., Moreno, C., Rivera, F., & García-Moya, I. (2013). The Role of the Family in Promoting Responsible Substance Use in Adolescence. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22(5), 585-602.
King, K. A., Vidourek, R. A., & Merianos, A. L. (2013). Psychosocial factors associated with drug abuse among youth. American Journal of Health Studies, 28(2), 68-76.
Oshri, A., Tubman, J. G., & Burnette, M. L. (2012). Childhood maltreatment histories, alcohol and other drug use symptoms, and sexual risk behavior in a treatment sample of adolescents. American journal of public health, 102(2), 250-257