Sample Paper on Why Power is Difficult to Analyze

Analysis of power

Why Power is Difficult to Analyze

The fact that power is multidimensional has made it difficult to analyze it. This is because many people who analyze power find it very difficult to add up the various dimensions to come up with an overall estimate of the actor’s power (Kendall 12). For example, Despite the fact that there are many similarities between the political power and the purchasing power, one similarity between the political and the purchasing power is the absence of a measuring rod of the former (Kendall 15).

Money can be used for measuring the purchasing power, but there is no tool that can be used to measure the standard of value, in terms of what adds up various dimensions of power to come up with a whole total or a fraction of it. Due to this, the estimates of an actor’s overall power can become controversial (Kendall 23). Many people see power as unchanging; this one-dimensional perspective of power paralyzes effective analysis and action on the subject. It is important to note that power is multidimensional; it changes according to the context and its circumstances.

The fact power does not function in more visible ways compared to other aspects of life makes it more difficult to analyze (Mills 34). To navigate the concept more effectively, the analyst has to pay attention to the dimensions of this concept. Dimensions that are less visible are very hard to analyze because power tends to be more concealed and diffused, it is incorporated into the cultural and the social norms and practices (Wrong15). The hidden power dimension is hard to engage, for example, some powerful people and institutions may maintain influence by controlling the people who get to the decision making table and what gets to the agenda (Kendall 48). A further challenge is that all the levels of power tend to operate simultaneously at a given moment. For this case, the analysts may focus on the visible aspects of power and overlook others (Kendall 49).

Demonstration of Difficulty in Analysis of Power by Scholars in the U.S

Many American scholars contend that it is difficult to analyze power in America and any other country. Thomas Carothers of the Carnegie endowment contends that “the missing link of power” is one of the key factors that undermine the scholars’ efforts (Kendall 53). The missing link gives short shrift to structures of power and interests, leading to failure of the analysis of power. In analyzing power, many scholars do not reflect on the hard thinking; they rely on the simplistic ideas concerning the institutional modeling (Wrong 34).

The hidden power dimension, which is hard to engage is visible in the American politics, because the powerful elite have dominated the federal government. This is seen directly through the work of the corporate lobbyists, the backroom super lawyers and the industry associations that represent the interests of the business sector, which are basically the elite (Kendall 47). Many power dimensions in America tend to operate simultaneously. In this case, the scholars focus on the visible aspects of power and overlook the others that are more concealed and diffused (Kendall 48). The people who are in the Elite group influence the federal government by using three methods, which ensures that they influence the things that happen in the white hous

Work cited

Kendall, D. The Power of Good Deeds:Priviledged Women and the Social Reproduction of Class. Lanham,MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2002.

Mills, Wright C. The Power Elite.Galaxy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Wrong, D. Power:Its Forms,Bases, and Uses. New Brunswick: Transactions Publishers, 2010.