Sample Research Paper on Can Woman Have it All?

Introduction

The controversial issue of whether women deserve the freedom to participate in maternal, as well as, other cores has different approaches. Accordingly, there was a different perspective about the women in the traditional setup then there is in the modern setup of families. Women, according to psychology, determine women as the weaker sex (Slaughter, 2012). Accordingly this is an explicit ideology that has been in line with most traditions, religions and even regional beliefs about women. The most paramount issue that parades today’s is the struggle for equitable rights for women to participate equally in national development rather than staying back home to perform pure maternal roles. Arguably, women deserve an equal right as men do. However, the extent to which the women access freedom to operate may affect the social norm of livelihood (Slaughter, 2012). Many aspects deplete the cordial relationships that exist between the two genuine categories of genders. Women can make perfect leaders. However, the question that is paramount is what for how long the women can take before they have it all. This essay explores the chances that are available for the women to play all-round responsibilities from home to work.

Impact on maternal responsibility

Women’s primary role, according to social studies, is to ensure safe upbringing of the children and maintaining stability in domestic issues. Therefore, the women may not be in a position to serve double purposes of moving out to work. This is, traditionally, a fatherly responsibility. Women, if given a chance to engage in employment and industrialization provide alternative priorities for the women rather than being the home-women type (Slaughter, 2012). This instills a social problem where issues such as divorce emerge. Women tend to believe in self-existence, especially when they manage to sustain themselves and the children. In the history of women’s persistence to balance careers, and maternal responsibilities could bring about distress and lack of concentration in corporate responsibilities allocated to them.

Force of economic distress

However, a different perspective has risen in the recent times. First, the economic times demand that more of the fatherly responsibility to ensure that family sustenance is feasible. Most of the fathers have a joint responsibility to support their wives in the zeal to work out these issues. Ideally, women can handle the family and the corporate responsibilities (Lemke, 2014). Mothers need to be close to the children. Alternatively, the male counterparts ought to offer their support to the women. Women have their responsibility to pursue their careers. It is predicted that homes that fathers are the only players in generating income may leave their children with utmost poverty. One of the impacts that arise is that there are minimal time and space for the male and female partners to have time together. The issue of divorce, in the recent past, has been dominant in such cases. However, not all cases are alike. Different approach towards women participating in multipurpose activities may infer the best solution available.

Conclusion

It is feasible that women can have it all. Ideally, the traditional perspective of handling women is supposed to be different due to the changing economic times. The women are necessities to perform both maternal and professional responsible responsibilities (Lemke, 2014). Women are empowered by their ability to perform different tasks. However, social impressions now approve that women can equally have it all. The responsibility to create a balance in situations and relationships, however, depends on the women themselves. Ideally, the issue of women multitasking is still contentious. Personal ideology may not serve the best purpose of a solution in the current times. Accordingly, the issue of women serving as the core elements in raising families and working is still not very clear. Hence, it is subject to future research, after better inference is made regarding the impacts of them being all-round human beings.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Slaughter, A. M. (2012, June 13). Why Women Still Can’t Have It All – Anne-Marie Slaughter – The Atlantic. Retrieved October 11, 2014, from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/07/why-women-still-cant-have-it-all/309020/

Lemke, C. (2014). Women in Leadership Positions: Can Women Have It All? Introductory Remarks. CAN WOMEN HAVE IT ALL?, 3.

Links:

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/07/why-women-still-cant-have-it-all/309020/

http://cems.as.nyu.edu/docs/CP/5037/MW_Working_Papers.pdf