Critiquing Internet Sources
This paper criticizes how a blog, podcast, or video scrutinizes Internet sources on global citizenship and multicultural understanding.
It incorporates an educational approach that highlights information concerning multicultural understanding and global citizenship. Kris Olds, the author of this blog that was drafted on March 11, 2012, claims that internationally, the interest in higher education has intensified since the past decade. The extension of civic education from a national focus to a global level has led to liberation in various states. Furthermore, diverse organizations have devoted their efforts to offering aid to institutions as a way of supporting global citizenship. A good example that supports education across different cultures in the world is the Association of American Colleges and Universities. The sponsor programs that associate with civil learning enhance democracy and support the US democracy to embrace global responsible citizenry. As a result, this promotes multicultural understanding and social responsibility among citizens hence creating diversity. Furthermore, students tend to study higher education programs that entail global issues on civic roles. This facilitates understanding when students develop a positive attitude towards local, national, and international societies. The author perceives global citizenship as a way of reasoning and relating with diversified cultures across different states. Olds adds that individuals consider themselves as global citizens via formative life experiences and different interpretations that define their cultures (Bily, 2012). In addition, he criticizes that self-awareness is vital for one to identify with the universal human experience.
On YouTube, a student from India shares his perspective on the significance of being a global citizen in a multicultural society. Hayagriva criticizes that a conflict, whether it happens near or very far, remains a global issue. This implies that it takes global citizens to put in efforts to hinder such incidences from taking place. To enhance global citizenship, people have a duty of protecting each other as human beings that is fulfilled through multi-cultural understanding. In his video, Hayagrish reveals that if citizens from diverse cultures unite to improve the current situation, many people will suffer due to conflicts. He talks about Haiti when it was hit by a devastating earthquake that led to the rise of global action to assist the victims involved. According to him, such action of helping others is an example of multicultural understanding and it exhibits the significance of being a global citizen.
He adds that as citizens of this world, we all share three universal goals that are equality, the pursuit of happiness, and liberty (Clemmitt, 2008). In this aspect, borders are insignificant in respect to global citizenship because people across the world strive hard to ensure that they achieve these goals. Hayagriva further criticizes the idea that individuals do not need to travel to different countries to be global citizens. They simply need to have a human conscience and adopt a global perception in learning about different cultures of people. Through this perspective, they assist others to achieve the three goals named above; hence, they will not be inflicted by poverty, greed, or conflict that hinders global peace. He mentions the aspect of human rights to be put into consideration by all states because it contributes to multicultural understanding and global citizenship.
Based on this digital platform, it perceives global citizenship to incorporate all individuals who have universal and basic human rights. This site exhibits its understanding of multi-culture by revealing that different states grant their citizens these rights. It criticizes the fact that as global citizens, we have a collective responsibility of getting to know and protect the human rights of individuals beyond our borders. To understand different cultures of people, there is also a need to overcome injustice behaviors whenever they arise. This source acknowledges global citizenship as a responsibility for every person and not only for individuals of high social rank in politics. It reflects a global citizen to be aware of diversity, respect, and understand the values of others to act in a meaningful manner. According to this site, it is vital for students to learn about global citizenship because it empowers them to comprehend and practice human rights for solidarity that creates a positive outcome in the world.
Analyzing the three sources, it is evident that the information it provides influences students’ behavior to embrace diversity in their social lives. This site also encourages all individuals in society to be part of global citizenship by clinching to human rights despite their social levels. All three sources are objective in giving out information because they include all genders while evaluating global citizenship (Harnack, 2007).
The three factors to consider when evaluating the Internet sources in research include;
- Accuracy; it enables a researcher to determine whether the Internet source provides factual details that are listed properly and can be verified in other trusted sources.
- Currency; this reveals whether a source is recent by displaying the date the page was drafted, first placed on the website, and the last individual to revise it.
- Authority; is the third factor that determines the reliability of information from an Internet source. It determines if the contents are clear and the individual or group that is responsible for details on the page. It verifies the authenticity of authors involved by exhibiting whether they qualify to write on a given topic.
Bily, C. (2012). The Internet. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press.
Clemmitt, M. (2008). Internet accuracy. Washington, D.C: CQ Press.
Harnack, A. (2007). Online; a reference guide to using Internet sources. New York: St. Martin’s.